November 2, 2025

The Planck satellite did not find the slightest curvature of space!

How is it possible that the Planck satellite could not have found the slightest curvature in space, if gravitation is the result of a geometric distortion of space-time?

Why did Einstein use Galileo's relativity of inertial motion for his 2 publications? Galileo explains that in inertial motion it is impossible for us to know if we are moving and at what speed or if we are stationary. Aristotle believed the Earth to be immobile, he did not know the relativity of motion. Not to be confused with the relativity of life, the relative importance of our emotions, etc.

Einstein measured a rod AB of length L by installing a clock at each of its ends and sending a ray of light and noting the going and returning time. These times are identical.

Then he observes the same rod moving at the speed v with respect to him who thinks he is immobile. Relativity says that it is possible that the rod is stationary and Einstein at the speed -v. He notes that an observer who accompanies the stem finds the same length as when it was stationary on the grounds that the observer moving with the stem is himself stationary with the stem.

Yes it's boring, it's good for children, nevertheless it's Einstein who wrote it.

Einstein, motionless, measures the moving rod and finds a longer time to catch up with B moving away on the way out and shorter on the way back with A getting closer. There is no longer equality of time, the measurement differs from that of the observer who accompanies the stem. Einstein calculated the length deviation and his calculation found the Lorentz transformations that would be published by Poincaré a year later but which had been discovered in 1903 by Woldemar Voigt.

The conclusion is that for Einstein speed does not change anything, lengths are not contracted or time dilated. This is what we measure when we look at the object in relative motion, but it is false. Einstein mentions the desynchronization of measurements (I would specify the equality of the speed of light in the two reference frames, something incomprehensible in my humble opinion that becomes understandable with my hypothesis)

That'is a delusional presentation, but that's what Einstein wrote in paragraph 2 of his chapitre 1

ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING

---